Everywhere else on the world-map has accepted indigenous peoples, for example: the Aborigines of Australia, the Maori of New Zealand, the American Indians, the Bushmen of South Africa, the Eskimos of Alaska etc. So why are the ethnic-British denied as an indigenous people? In fact why are White Europeans in general denied as being native to their own lands? The answer is the fact that once a people is approved of as indigenous they are granted certain rights under the 'Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples', rights which mean they can segregate, have their own land and self-rule. The madness of modern political correctness however has made it the case though that white european ethnic-groups, including most importantly the ethnic-British can never be entitled to these rights, while virtually all other races can. Thoughts?
Thoughts? I think this place is becoming very boring, very rapidly. It stems from 2 things: 1 - Severe lack of high grade drugs in the NE area. 2 - The few that do still post on here have grown up, grown very grumpy and have nothing better to do than regurgitate the daily news. Deacon would be turning in his Chilli pots looking The 'Banter' section on here lately.
Yes but only those named gain the selective title of 'indigenous peoples' and the benefits that come with it. Why dont the indigenous peoples of Europe get this accolade?
Check out Danie Mellor for a proud indigenous Australia. He looks totally white, but feels Indigenous and is accepted as an Aboriginal in the indigenous community. My point being, if you feel British what the fuck has the colour of your skin got to do with anything?
The British Empire had to give back its conquered lands. Handing them back to their original owners. Why shouldn’t the Abos and Indians be given back their lands? Because they were conquered by the dominate white man who "bettered" their lands (in our opinion of course) It stinks of hypocrisy but hey that’s life
